Information Communication Technology ICT – 10 Communication | e-Consult
10 Communication (1 questions)
Login to see all questions.
Click on a question to view the answer
The information presented – that 90% of teenagers experience anxiety due to social media – is highly questionable and likely unreliable. Several factors contribute to this:
- Source: The website's credibility is unknown. Is it a reputable academic institution, a government agency, a well-known research organization, or a personal blog? Without knowing the source, it's impossible to assess its authority.
- Bias: The statement is very strong (90%) and could indicate a biased source. The source might have a vested interest in portraying social media negatively (e.g., a mental health charity focusing on the harms of social media).
- Up-to-date information: The information needs to be dated. Social media trends and the impact on mental health are constantly evolving. A statistic from 5 years ago might not be relevant today.
- Evidence: The website should provide evidence to support this claim. Does it cite research studies, surveys, or other credible sources? A lack of supporting evidence is a major red flag.
Therefore, the 90% figure should be treated with extreme skepticism. The student needs to seek information from more reliable sources like academic journals, reputable news organizations, or government reports. They should look for corroborating evidence from multiple sources before accepting this claim as fact.