analyse and evaluate sources and/or processes to support research, arguments and perspectives

📚 Research, Analysis & Evaluation – IGCSE Global Perspectives 0457

1️⃣ Introduction

In Global Perspectives you’ll often need to gather information, look at it closely, and decide if it’s trustworthy. Think of it like being a detective 🕵️‍♂️: you collect clues, examine them, and decide which story fits best.

2️⃣ Types of Sources

  • 📖 Primary sources – original evidence (e.g., a diary entry, a photo, a speech).
  • 📚 Secondary sources – analysis or interpretation of primary sources (e.g., a history book, a news article).
  • 🗞️ Tertiary sources – summaries of primary and secondary sources (e.g., encyclopedias, databases).

3️⃣ Evaluating Sources – The 5 C’s

Use these criteria to judge each source:

Criterion What to Look For
Credibility Who wrote it? Are they an expert? Check author’s credentials.
Accuracy Does the information match other reliable sources? Look for citations.
Currency Is it up‑to‑date? For fast‑changing topics, newer is usually better.
Purpose & Bias Why was it written? Is there an agenda? Look for balanced viewpoints.
Coverage Does it cover the topic comprehensively or only a slice?

4️⃣ Analyzing Data & Arguments

Once you have trustworthy sources, break them down:

  1. 🔍 Identify the main claim or thesis.
  2. 📊 Look at the evidence – facts, statistics, quotes.
  3. 🧩 Check the logic – does the evidence support the claim? Are there gaps?
  4. 🤔 Consider counter‑arguments – what could someone else say?

5️⃣ Evaluating Processes

Research isn’t just about sources; it’s also about how you gather and use them.

  • 🗂️ Search strategy – use specific keywords, Boolean operators (AND, OR, NOT).
  • 📑 Note‑taking – keep track of where each piece of info came from.
  • 🔄 Review & revise – revisit earlier steps if new evidence emerges.

6️⃣ Case Study: Climate Change Debate

Let’s walk through a quick example.

  1. 🔎 Source 1: A peer‑reviewed journal article (primary). Credible, accurate, recent.
  2. 📚 Source 2: A popular science magazine (secondary). Good coverage, but check for sensationalism.
  3. 🗞️ Source 3: An encyclopedia entry (tertiary). Great for quick facts, but less depth.
  4. 🧠 Analysis: The journal article provides hard data (e.g., temperature rise $ΔT = 1.2^\circ$C since 1850). The magazine adds real‑world stories, while the encyclopedia confirms the trend.
  5. 🧐 Evaluation: Combine the strengths: use the data for arguments, stories for impact, and the encyclopedia for quick checks.

7️⃣ Key Takeaways

  • 🔑 Treat every source like a puzzle piece – it must fit with the rest.
  • 🛠️ Use the 5 C’s to test credibility.
  • 📈 Analyse evidence, logic, and counter‑arguments before forming a conclusion.
  • 🔄 Keep your research process flexible; new info can change your view.
  • 💡 Remember: the goal is to build a solid, well‑supported argument that others can trust.

Revision

Log in to practice.

0 views 0 suggestions