analyse and evaluate sources and/or processes to support research, arguments and perspectives
📚 Research, Analysis & Evaluation – IGCSE Global Perspectives 0457
1️⃣ Introduction
In Global Perspectives you’ll often need to gather information, look at it closely, and decide if it’s trustworthy. Think of it like being a detective 🕵️♂️: you collect clues, examine them, and decide which story fits best.
2️⃣ Types of Sources
- 📖 Primary sources – original evidence (e.g., a diary entry, a photo, a speech).
- 📚 Secondary sources – analysis or interpretation of primary sources (e.g., a history book, a news article).
- 🗞️ Tertiary sources – summaries of primary and secondary sources (e.g., encyclopedias, databases).
3️⃣ Evaluating Sources – The 5 C’s
Use these criteria to judge each source:
| Criterion | What to Look For |
|---|---|
| Credibility | Who wrote it? Are they an expert? Check author’s credentials. |
| Accuracy | Does the information match other reliable sources? Look for citations. |
| Currency | Is it up‑to‑date? For fast‑changing topics, newer is usually better. |
| Purpose & Bias | Why was it written? Is there an agenda? Look for balanced viewpoints. |
| Coverage | Does it cover the topic comprehensively or only a slice? |
4️⃣ Analyzing Data & Arguments
Once you have trustworthy sources, break them down:
- 🔍 Identify the main claim or thesis.
- 📊 Look at the evidence – facts, statistics, quotes.
- 🧩 Check the logic – does the evidence support the claim? Are there gaps?
- 🤔 Consider counter‑arguments – what could someone else say?
5️⃣ Evaluating Processes
Research isn’t just about sources; it’s also about how you gather and use them.
- 🗂️ Search strategy – use specific keywords, Boolean operators (AND, OR, NOT).
- 📑 Note‑taking – keep track of where each piece of info came from.
- 🔄 Review & revise – revisit earlier steps if new evidence emerges.
6️⃣ Case Study: Climate Change Debate
Let’s walk through a quick example.
- 🔎 Source 1: A peer‑reviewed journal article (primary). Credible, accurate, recent.
- 📚 Source 2: A popular science magazine (secondary). Good coverage, but check for sensationalism.
- 🗞️ Source 3: An encyclopedia entry (tertiary). Great for quick facts, but less depth.
- 🧠 Analysis: The journal article provides hard data (e.g., temperature rise $ΔT = 1.2^\circ$C since 1850). The magazine adds real‑world stories, while the encyclopedia confirms the trend.
- 🧐 Evaluation: Combine the strengths: use the data for arguments, stories for impact, and the encyclopedia for quick checks.
7️⃣ Key Takeaways
- 🔑 Treat every source like a puzzle piece – it must fit with the rest.
- 🛠️ Use the 5 C’s to test credibility.
- 📈 Analyse evidence, logic, and counter‑arguments before forming a conclusion.
- 🔄 Keep your research process flexible; new info can change your view.
- 💡 Remember: the goal is to build a solid, well‑supported argument that others can trust.
Revision
Log in to practice.
0 views
0 suggestions